Gps wrote:I like how that sounds, will have a look at the lmms file later.

The latest track I am working on has three EQ in three different channels. For me that's a record.

So you don't EQ each instrument?

I just spent about 30 minutes writing feedback for everyone on this thread so far and when I hit submit the forum took me to a login screen because apparently I took too long and my session expired. Uh, that's a load of junk and should be fixed. I'm sorry, but I don't have the time to do that again...

That song is simple, yet it's still good.

kevinTOC wrote:i am using linux and i dont know what the specs are

Even though the video I posted is targeted towards Windows, you can try enlarging the buffer size as shown in the video. Old computers need a larger buffer to keep the audio from glitching.

I didn't notice any obvious out-of-tune notes.

I recently looked at the waveform of this track in Audacity and see that it hasn't been brickwall-limited. Tracks with dynamic volume seem to be uncommon these days, and it's something I appreciate.

You can try adjusting some sound settings.
This video could be helpful: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpGd0y16GVg

I'd say it has a good emphasis on the low end, with some hats to fill up the higher frequencies. The snares are much more present than Gps' mix. Good usage of volume and panning, though it could have been mixed a little bit louder overall. Thank you. :D I'm not experienced at using LMMS's compresso...

tanner wrote:so, this is just a mixing? no arrangement, additions etc. ?

That's right.

You have a very professional sound. What synths did you use for the main melody?