And a fresh version, Deleted one clap and made it softer. Turned down decay a bit further on the ZynaddsubFX bassline. Changed the easyQ settings. Much better then the uplaod from yesterday, what do you guys think? I think I can call this one finished, although I still want to try side chaining. htt...

Changes: Made the bass-line fatter, by: Cloning the bassline track, Put the notes of the clone an octave down, lowered in zynaddSubFx, sustain and decay. Changed the choir pad already there. (Different preset) Added a choir in the breaks. Added a pad, another ZynaddSubFX track. Changed two drum pres...

You get a fuller sound and prob also wider stereo.

Yep choir sound was already there, quite soft though.

Cubase prob is the oldest daw (sequencer) still around. Proof :p https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8G6QWUT-4U The big difference, with what we do with LMMS, is that our computers generate the sound. The Atari ST did not make the sound, the Atari with Cubase was the sequencer, sending midi out data to...

If I listen to the origenal I dont seem to be missing something. Still that one makes me wanna dance, mine version however that second part makes me yawn. lol

Just watched that vid, very interesting. There are definitely advantages doing it that way. You have more freedom in were the notes end up.

Thought so, on Linux files don't need extensions, that's why it does not mind two dots in the file name. But more important I hope this will help Chrimiting.

[joking] Let me start by saying, its off course not possible mucicbear was right :P Serious though: Very happy with my track our house music, I still had this nagging feeling something was missing. Musicbear suggested at one moment, to add a pad with side chaining. Then started to wonder if this was...

A House party, now that a good idea.

I think I need a break form that other party. I am starting to get annoyed again. Starting to be very happy about the start, but the piece after that, sounds so boring, and I can't figure out why.