LMMS is not meant to be a 'competing' DAW.rakeshoo7 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 10:23 amReaper is another feature-rich DAW that is popular partly due to its low price tag (for non-professional use). Reaper has more bells and whistles than LMMS but my impression is that LMMS is improving with each update -- so the two DAWs might even compete in the future.
LMMS is free and will be for e v e r!
Imho project-LMMS has caused the commercial DAW publishers, to offer free versions of their software. Some with track-limitations, some with feature differences, but still free-versions -Even Pro-tools, that is a Studio-grade DAW, can now be found in a free version!
I see that as a 'lmms-effect' :p
Lets be brutally honest:
Lmms cant in any witch way 'compete' with Pro-tools. Pro-tools is simply just better -Even FLs is better. Its not just features, it is just better cores.
B..u..t
LMMS has a h u g e benefit over all other DAWs: LMMS is user driven!
Everything you see in LMMS is the result of user wishes!
That is a difference that lifts LMMS up over everything, especially if a user is a coder, because then the user can add his own feature and LMMS evolves every time.
No commercial DAW can offer that
LMMS is in fact a modding DAW!
Besides that, since you are new in Forum
Welcome rakeshoo7 !
Here are all important links:
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4740
-A few rules and useful forum instructions