Newer version of Vangelis ? like track

Share and discuss your LMMS music projects here, and see what people think!
So I uploaded a newer version. I would like you guys to tell me, if it has improved.
I have been putting in quite a few plugins.
To me the newer version, sounds less, like it made with a computer, but do you guys agree on this?
I does have a few more tracks too, and I tried to make the break more different.

I will prob for now call it finished. (I first need to learn more stuff, before I can prob further improve on it)
https://soundcloud.com/user586365033/vangelis-jarre

Older version, which is not that much different, but I did spend many extra hours on the newer version.
https://soundcloud.com/user586365033/vangelis

Please be critical, I myself am already quite happy, but I don't learn anything from being happy.
I do like how it builds up to a wall of sound, but I still have to learn a lot, I still don't think I am using the full potential of LMMS.

Specific hints on how to improve further are of course welcome.
But for now I am gonna finish other stuff.
Wuut? When did you get soo good :) The new version was really cool! Love the arpeggios that appeard after a little over one minute. And I can hear that you have learned to stay within tune. I think you can be very satisfied with this tune, sounds good.
Thank you.

Its funny though how different people react. I myself love that arpeggio too, but I had one person calling it 8 bit computer like.
I always think about negative feedback, but in this case, regardless of, if he is right or not, I love that arpeggio, and I don't want to change it.
You did well with this. You have nice transistions, and the sound of the arpeggio is good, and in key! If i should point to one thing, it should be the length -Something i struggle with too :p
+9 mins is long.
Yeah you really get into a piece, and then find out its 12 minutes. This version is even already shortened a bit.
I was also shocked by the size of the wave file.120MB LOL.

But all tracks I know of , made by Vangelis or Jarre are shorter. ( at least concerning a part that repeats, like in mine )

I often find those tracks not long enough for my likings, but maybe that's the trick, why I keep playing them over and over.
It makes you want more.
Gps wrote:if he is right or not
Of course his right, we are all right. Do you think there is a correct answer in music?
Hey I like it!
If you want some criticism and suggestion (take it or leave it): I don't mind the length, but if I were doing it I'd probably try to build a little more tension leading up to the transitions (like ~ 4:00/minutes?), perhaps by using automation to increase the dissonance of the bass, or distortion, or slowly fading-in a dissonant ambient eerie sound... But obviously that would take the track in darker direction.
Keep it up!
Sti-Jay wrote:
Gps wrote:if he is right or not
Of course his right, we are all right. Do you think there is a correct answer in music?
LOl good point.
farawayinspace wrote:Hey I like it!
If you want some criticism and suggestion (take it or leave it): I don't mind the length, but if I were doing it I'd probably try to build a little more tension leading up to the transitions (like ~ 4:00/minutes?), perhaps by using automation to increase the dissonance of the bass, or distortion, or slowly fading-in a dissonant ambient eerie sound... But obviously that would take the track in darker direction.
Keep it up!
Thank you, and I always like criticism / suggestions.
I usual learn from it. And if I don't agree, I can always ignore it.

Transitions is as I see it, still one of my weaker points.
Most of my music jumps too much from one part to another, instead of having some kind of transition.

Who is online

In total there are 27 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 26 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 238 on Wed Oct 23, 2019 11:40 am

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 26 guests