EDIT: Here's what we have so far:
My Tea Is Too Hot (CaLRo):
Original: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=7918
High On Remix: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=7919
Ideality (High On):
Original: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=7902
CaLRo Remix: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=7989
Tanner re-remix: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=8018
High On low-CPU re-remix: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=8019
Adverse Effects (High On):
Original: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=8015
AZ Remix: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=8024
Formerly Electro House (AZ):
Original: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=8029
High On Remix: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=8032
I went by the artist name Love Amplifier until two days ago I renamed myself "HIGH ON".
I couldn't help but notice that I might actually be the most successful musician who uses LMMS. I make enough off my music to pay for my lifestyle, and I work full-time on music and free software.
I write WTF DJ for chrome, a program that, together with LMMS, replaces Ableton for me. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/deta ... djcf?hl=en.
There aren't any LMMS users on Wikipedia's LMMS article yet.
Who wants to help me change this?
I, for one, am getting seriously close to forking the whole damn thing and porting it to chrome's native client so trendy hipster DJs can smash their laptops or phones on the stage at the end of their sets.
WTF DJ already does the Ableton-like mixing portion of the job, and that's like 300 lines of javascript. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtvufOZKOMM
But who cares, that's just free software. I can work full-time on free software, and make "enough" money off of the music I make while testing the software. Not everyone has that option.
No, that's wrong. You DO have that option. If I can get five of you to join a band, and fix the music up so my record label will publish it, I will straight up make five times as much money, and you will get the same amount.
I don't care about the money. I care about doing something notable with my life.
My record label is on Wikipedia. My DAW is on wikipedia.
I could start a record label, and I am writing a DAW, but I would rather be notable for music first.
Does anyone here want to get serious and say, "I don't care, we can make it if we work together"?
Here's my plan:
1. - We each submit one track, up to half an hour long.
(Mine is 23 minutes long, if I get one other person to put that much effort in, we will already have an album's worth of material.)
2. - We take turns remixing the "x remix" of the track, where x is the name we choose for our collaboration.
3. - We repeatedly submit our best collaborative efforts as demos to record labels seeking submissions.
Does this seem like a bad idea to anyone? I think we can make this work. The best projects in the LSP are all remixes of other people's work, and it really shows what it is that's "missing" from each of our own works: a combined effort.
I know we all love how our own tracks sound but if we're going to change them so that everyone loves them, why not get started with the people who can make changes by themselves?
I've remixed 10 different people's tracks from the LSP already.
Imagine if we all worked together on those tracks. Repeatedly, for a year. Where would we be?
I'm done imagining. NOW IS THE TIME.
So, if anyone wants to get started, post a soundcloud link here of your best song.
We'll worry about the project files later, let's just get the blueprint for a solid EDM album going on in this thread.
I worked hard on this track, I will work just as hard on yours.
https://soundcloud.com/highon/no-way
My Tea Is Too Hot (CaLRo):
Original: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=7918
High On Remix: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=7919
Ideality (High On):
Original: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=7902
CaLRo Remix: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=7989
Tanner re-remix: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=8018
High On low-CPU re-remix: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=8019
Adverse Effects (High On):
Original: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=8015
AZ Remix: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=8024
Formerly Electro House (AZ):
Original: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=8029
High On Remix: https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=8032
I went by the artist name Love Amplifier until two days ago I renamed myself "HIGH ON".
I couldn't help but notice that I might actually be the most successful musician who uses LMMS. I make enough off my music to pay for my lifestyle, and I work full-time on music and free software.
I write WTF DJ for chrome, a program that, together with LMMS, replaces Ableton for me. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/deta ... djcf?hl=en.
There aren't any LMMS users on Wikipedia's LMMS article yet.
Who wants to help me change this?
I, for one, am getting seriously close to forking the whole damn thing and porting it to chrome's native client so trendy hipster DJs can smash their laptops or phones on the stage at the end of their sets.
WTF DJ already does the Ableton-like mixing portion of the job, and that's like 300 lines of javascript. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtvufOZKOMM
But who cares, that's just free software. I can work full-time on free software, and make "enough" money off of the music I make while testing the software. Not everyone has that option.
No, that's wrong. You DO have that option. If I can get five of you to join a band, and fix the music up so my record label will publish it, I will straight up make five times as much money, and you will get the same amount.
I don't care about the money. I care about doing something notable with my life.
My record label is on Wikipedia. My DAW is on wikipedia.
I could start a record label, and I am writing a DAW, but I would rather be notable for music first.
Does anyone here want to get serious and say, "I don't care, we can make it if we work together"?
Here's my plan:
1. - We each submit one track, up to half an hour long.
(Mine is 23 minutes long, if I get one other person to put that much effort in, we will already have an album's worth of material.)
2. - We take turns remixing the "x remix" of the track, where x is the name we choose for our collaboration.
3. - We repeatedly submit our best collaborative efforts as demos to record labels seeking submissions.
Does this seem like a bad idea to anyone? I think we can make this work. The best projects in the LSP are all remixes of other people's work, and it really shows what it is that's "missing" from each of our own works: a combined effort.
I know we all love how our own tracks sound but if we're going to change them so that everyone loves them, why not get started with the people who can make changes by themselves?
I've remixed 10 different people's tracks from the LSP already.
Imagine if we all worked together on those tracks. Repeatedly, for a year. Where would we be?
I'm done imagining. NOW IS THE TIME.
So, if anyone wants to get started, post a soundcloud link here of your best song.
We'll worry about the project files later, let's just get the blueprint for a solid EDM album going on in this thread.
I worked hard on this track, I will work just as hard on yours.
https://soundcloud.com/highon/no-way