All Dubstep Tutorial

[killakam98]

delete pls

[orpheon7]

Don't take this badly, but your songs still need a lot of work before you can say with authority that LMMS is good for dubstep.
Your buildups are a bit too regular, the basses not powerful enough and I suspect you didn't really equalize much, because I hear lots of overloading (although that may be on purpose). Also, lots of dissonance.
Again, I don't want to bash on you. Just pointing a few things out.

The main reasons LMMS is not good for dubstep for me are the lack of vector-based automation (as it is now, it sort of sucks), the lack of ability to sync LFO speeds of the best synth (ZynAddSubFX) to the song tempo, and lack of ability to automate said LFO speeds of ZASF. After that, maybe the lack of a graphical equalizer, but Spectrum Analyser + LDSPA eqs work too.
These flaws exist, and while you can work around some, you can't around all, and that is annoying.

[killakam98]

Don't take this badly, but your songs still need a lot of work before you can say with authority that LMMS is good for dubstep.
Your buildups are a bit too regular, the basses not powerful enough and I suspect you didn't really equalize much, because I hear lots of overloading (although that may be on purpose). Also, lots of dissonance.
Again, I don't want to bash on you. Just pointing a few things out.

The main reasons LMMS is not good for dubstep for me are the lack of vector-based automation (as it is now, it sort of sucks), the lack of ability to sync LFO speeds of the best synth (ZynAddSubFX) to the song tempo, and lack of ability to automate said LFO speeds of ZASF. After that, maybe the lack of a graphical equalizer, but Spectrum Analyser + LDSPA eqs work too.
These flaws exist, and while you can work around some, you can't around all, and that is annoying.

I now know that, and ive improved alot, and despite those flaws, lmms is still a preety good program to do dubstep in as it can support vst plugins, so you can use plugins like Synth1, Massive, Z3ta, and others, just look at this track by Lazerblade, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nliTtpCKlBE and im redoing this, from a tutorial to just some tips, im not ready for tutorials.

[cc-inc]

The main reasons LMMS is not good for dubstep for me are the lack of vector-based automation (as it is now, it sort of sucks), the lack of ability to sync LFO speeds of the best synth (ZynAddSubFX) to the song tempo, and lack of ability to automate said LFO speeds of ZASF. After that, maybe the lack of a graphical equalizer, but Spectrum Analyser + LDSPA eqs work too.
These flaws exist, and while you can work around some, you can't around all, and that is annoying.

It's true, LMMS is missing some features that are needed to (easily) make some solid Dubstep.
But where there's a will there is a way, there are always possibilities......even tho they are a friggin' detour compared to other programs out there

[Sti-Jay]

Well LMMS is not horrible to make dubstep with...

Just listen to this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwQAJRUp ... ature=plcp