Most recommendations on Mastering-process, focus on external wave-processing programs, like audacity for windows, and ardeur for linux users.
I have no knowledge in respect to the benefit from doing mastering on wave-files instead of working in LMMS directly (should say that i use the RC with multi-FX-mixer, so any signal, single or compound, can be mastered with own specific settings of any effect)
Imo it is more flexible, to have any group or any instrument, mastering up agains 'something', than aplying the same on everything?
Alternatively, one could export individual tracks, and then do segmented mastering on these exported wavefiles, but then a multi-track-wave-editor, would be needed (donno if ardeur has that feature...?)
But are there obvious reasons for not mastering in LMMS?
Will the result be of lower quality? (why)
Are there processes that simply cant be done? (what)
looking fwd to an interesting discussion
I have no knowledge in respect to the benefit from doing mastering on wave-files instead of working in LMMS directly (should say that i use the RC with multi-FX-mixer, so any signal, single or compound, can be mastered with own specific settings of any effect)
Imo it is more flexible, to have any group or any instrument, mastering up agains 'something', than aplying the same on everything?
Alternatively, one could export individual tracks, and then do segmented mastering on these exported wavefiles, but then a multi-track-wave-editor, would be needed (donno if ardeur has that feature...?)
But are there obvious reasons for not mastering in LMMS?
Will the result be of lower quality? (why)
Are there processes that simply cant be done? (what)
looking fwd to an interesting discussion