Wed Oct 15, 2014 5:21 pm
Stakeout Punch wrote:@AncientMind I agree with you 100% that no community should smooth talk something that could use fixing.
However, LMMS has not had an active development cycle until more recently. Whoever gave you bad advice about the program was more than likely going off the fact that for at least 2 years (afaik, could be way more or less) LMMS had zero updates. Users that were dedicated to LMMS and knew that the issues wouldn't be fixed for a while came up with ways to get around the problems.
Anyways, LMMS is now considered an active project and has seen much progression thanks to @diizy and others on the github repo (https://github.com/LMMS). With github we can state issues and know that they will be seen and at least discussed. However, some still like their work-arounds I suppose.
... and I'm happy to see the steps made and the new born activity. I always knew, LMMS can become a very good alternative to given commercialware, but... here there has to be a healty feedback level. And although this point really looks much better now, but there's still a bit to do.
