Re: Is LMMS Similar to FL Studio?
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:00 pm
Here is an up-to-date feature comparison among the different FL versions: http://www.image-line.com/flstudio-feature-comparison/musikbear wrote:i was f.i. quite unhappy with the fact that the start-offer diddent include piano-roll, and that instruments like Sytrus, also was a separate buy (this was when i last looked a.m.a)
147$ for the max-pack, is a real surprise for me.
Notice that the basic edition include piano roll

I also think that free Sytrus would be nice, but it is very powerful and worth every cent IMO. You get what you pay for.
For someone serious about production I would recommend starting with the Producer Edition. FL is not only one of the cheaper DAWs to get started with, they also offer free updates (as I have mentioned before). There are very few other companies that offer that. Some make you purchase the entire next version, some charge a fee to upgrade. I would like to point out that most other DAWs function like modern OS upgrade schemes. You buy the software, then get bug updates until the next version is revealed, often with many new features. LMMS differs a bit because each "major" release is more of an incremental upgrade with bug fixes strewn in.
Same reason why I started with LMMS! However, that estimate is off if you are a frugal buyer and patient enough to wait for sales. FL's lower versions come with capable synths that easily match what comes with LMMS. The real powerhouses like Sytrus and Harmor blow what is in LMMS away, and their price reflects that. However, if you are looking into this as more of a side hobby, LMMS should work fine for you.datahead8888 wrote:That's probably too expensive now. I'm mainly interested in writing music for retro games I create, though, so I might be able to skimp on instruments for now.
For free, your options are limited. I've seen nice things about Ardour, but it does not run on Windows if that matters to you. If you are serious about music creation and want to really get into producing, I think that getting a paid DAW is the eventual way to go, but LMMS is a great way to learn the ropes without thinning your wallet too much. From what it sounds like, I would recommend sticking with LMMS for the time being. You lose nothing but time this way, and generally speaking music production's concepts and methods are universal among DAWs.datahead8888 wrote:is there another free DAW you would suggest, or is a paid DAW probably the best way to go?