Do you think using presets is "cheating"?

Anything that doesn't fit into other topics goes here!
Dose a pianist, or a guitarist, reinvent the piano, or the guitar to fit their music?
Well no, so using presets is not cheating, It's just someone picking up an instrument to play their music with. Musicians over the years, have studied and perfected their skills to one, or two instruments.
I can't say I'm cheating when I sit down, and play a.Steinway grand piano. The same goes for presets in LMMS.
I'm going to reiterate that playing a physical instrument is not the same as using a vitrual one. You have to learn how to play it first. The same could be said of synthesizers, you have to learn how to use it, right? Well, not exactly, cause these darn things called presets. Who cares how a complex synth like Serum works if we can just load up cool sounds, right? I wish I could download presets to level up my trumpet playing skills ;)

I get it, some people are more interested in the end product than the process, and presets and technology in general allow them to do that. Is using a virtual string modelling synth cheating? In terms of actual talent, maybe... But in all reality no, because using it would require a separate skill set (processing, FX, etc... no modelling synth can compare to the real deal without some serious work, ya know?).
Eino wrote:have studied and perfected their skills to one, or two instruments.
I can't say I'm cheating when I sit down, and play a.Steinway grand piano.
Exactly. Physical instruments require some skill to play [well]. A serious time investment by both the instrument manufacturer (eh, sometimes) and the musician. It makes sense, if you have never played/learned how to play a piano, you can't just sit at one and play like Mozart.

As I've said, I think that these are separate mediums (physical vs virtual). IF* you are using a synthesizer that is based off of knobs that the user fiddles with to create different sounds with, would that be comparable to learning the techniques for different tones on say, a trumpet? Parallels, anyone?
*Some synths are completely based off presets, like Nexus. Physical modelling synths fit in this category too, they are designed to emulate physical instruments, so I would place them more in between the two groups (physical vs virtual).
slipstick wrote:As you say there's merit to both views. if you feel that designing all the sounds is vital to making your music and that using any pre-existing sound is cheating then go for it.

I think composing the notes, finding or making a suitable set of sounds and getting the arrangement right is enough of a challenge for me. A bit like a classical composer and orchestrator puts the notes together and arranges which instruments will play which parts but doesn't feel the need to invent brand new instruments because violins and pianos have already been done ;).

Steve
I like and agree with this, Steve.

At the end of the day, this whole topic is based completely off of opinion, so there will never be a right or wrong answer. If someone just wants to make music, presets are probably their choice and that's fine. I actually tend to think of people that use presets as more composers than producers (arranging instruments vs making stuff from scratch).

Ultimatum: Make music how you want to, your mileage may vary.
Here's another gaming analogy:

How about bashing the random (RAND) button until a good sound comes out of a synth, and use that as a "self-made" preset?

Luck versus skill.
However good a sound you get from a synth it ain't music until you've done a lot more with it than just think "Ooh that's a nice noise". As a minimum you'll have to arrange a few notes in an order that sounds good.

Of course you could get a simple random program to produce note sequences too. Then there's real skill in picking the good sequence from all the rubbish. Just like there's some skill in choosing a (preset) synth sound that works for your music ;).

Whenever you find a piece of music that sounds good to you I'm willing to bet it didn't happen entirely by accident :)

Steve
So Kraftwerk, was once, the only not cheating much, Artist / band ? :P

They even made their own instruments.

0.40 min.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5c81X6BiI0Y

Oops Damn, I also see a Minimoog, they cheat too. ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5c81X6BiI0Y
I bet even Ugg in the caveman days just picked up a "preset" rock and banged it. By some people's standards even that counts as cheating. He should have made his own rock ;).

Steve
slipstick wrote:I bet even Ugg in the caveman days just picked up a "preset" rock and banged it. By some people's standards even that counts as cheating. He should have made his own rock ;).

Steve
A hollow log would sound nice with the rock. lol
In my opinion the cheating is Similar what Gps wrote: "using some awesome marketed song that was converted in midi and using it as it is without give at least the reference" :)
or using similar melody with same sequence a lot without mentioning that it is quoted from someone else.
In my opinion using ready to go presets isn't cheating. I'm using lot of presets that I've made before and also some presets of other people. Of course it's not like just put on "grid" and play. I adjust every sound to make it fit to the song. Using ready presets is very inspirational for me. Many times I found great ideas for my other songs. I'd say that using ready loops or midis (!) is cheating.
The sarcasm is real!