The pattern/base/beat editor:
If I see it right, the only (or intendend, for that matter) way to change the length of a pattern is right click the instrument and choose "add ... steps" from the context menu. But that, just as "remove ... steps" behaves strangely:
Adding steps only adds them on one of the instruments and distorts the beat-line, so that the instrument's beat-line to which I added the steps (what's the point of adding steps on a per instrument basis, anyway?) has more beats than the others and therefore no longer lines up.
And once I filled up all instruments to have the same beat-length, I cannot shorten it again. When I then "remove ... steps" on one of the instruments, the beats still line up (as oppossed to adding steps), but even if I remove the steps on all instruments, the pattern will not shorten.
Given what an incredible software LMMS is, I wonder whether I'm maybe using a deprecated feature and the beat-editor is supposed to be operated differently these days? It seems pretty poor quality compared to the rest of LMMS, given alone how the beatline distorts.
If I see it right, the only (or intendend, for that matter) way to change the length of a pattern is right click the instrument and choose "add ... steps" from the context menu. But that, just as "remove ... steps" behaves strangely:
Adding steps only adds them on one of the instruments and distorts the beat-line, so that the instrument's beat-line to which I added the steps (what's the point of adding steps on a per instrument basis, anyway?) has more beats than the others and therefore no longer lines up.
And once I filled up all instruments to have the same beat-length, I cannot shorten it again. When I then "remove ... steps" on one of the instruments, the beats still line up (as oppossed to adding steps), but even if I remove the steps on all instruments, the pattern will not shorten.
Given what an incredible software LMMS is, I wonder whether I'm maybe using a deprecated feature and the beat-editor is supposed to be operated differently these days? It seems pretty poor quality compared to the rest of LMMS, given alone how the beatline distorts.