Page 1 of 1
Meltdown between Hydrogen and LMMS would be!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: June 3rd, 2012, 12:28 am
by Sti-Jay
If LMMS an Hydrogen in some way could melt down to one application... I am thinking; The beat & base editor which sucks being entirely replaced with the cool program Hydrogen!!! WOW!!
It would be the coolest thing which have happened in the last ten years!!
Ahh, dreams...
Re: Meltdown between Hydrogen and LMMS would be!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: June 5th, 2012, 2:26 pm
by orpheon7
An (better) alternative would be to enable good JACK support with LMMS, this way people can actually pipe stuff where they want it.
Re: Meltdown between Hydrogen and LMMS would be!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: June 5th, 2012, 5:29 pm
by lazerblade
Jack works fine for me in LMMS. I use it to pipe MIDI and audio all the time.
Re: Meltdown between Hydrogen and LMMS would be!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: June 5th, 2012, 7:02 pm
by orpheon7
lazerblade wrote:Jack works fine for me in LMMS. I use it to pipe MIDI and audio all the time.
Heh. When I start JACK and then LMMS, LMMS appears in Patchage but only with one pair of outputs and one midi entrance that doesn't want to bind with stuff it binds with in ALSA. There's no way to pipe external synths into LMMS or to pipe MIDI data from LMMS to external synths yet on my end, or at least I haven't found it yet.
PS: Nice tuts.
Re: Meltdown between Hydrogen and LMMS would be!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: March 2nd, 2015, 12:08 pm
by tavasti
Yes, better jack support for lmms would be great. For example, non-timeline & non-sequencer work great together with hydrogen. Pressing play on non-timeline will result hydrogen starting on sync. I would prefer using lmms for sequencer / synth engine, but beats from hydrogen, and recordings (guitar, vocals) from non-timeline.
I would also like to route some of instruments from lmms to external programs, for example routing some guitar-like synths to guitarix.
Better Jack support
Posted: March 3rd, 2015, 5:36 am
by tavasti
Seem that better hack support is ticket & in milestone for 1.3
https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/1467